Download SAP : C_THR81 Fragen & Antworten als PDF & Test Software

In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core tenant, a consultant is validating a global transfer process in the web-based UI before a pilot rollout. Users can start the transfer transaction, but for one regional population the target location list is empty after a legal entity is selected. Other regions show valid locations as expected.
HR administrators confirm that the missing locations were recently added during a corporate data update and should only be available for a defined set of organizational combinations. The customer wants the issue fixed without exposing locations outside their intended scope or asking users to complete transfers with temporary placeholder values.
What is the best next step?
Response:

• A. Review the foundation object relationships for the new locations and correct the organizational associations controlling their availability for that regional transfer scenario.
• B. Ask HR administrators to complete the transfer with a generic location and update the final location afterward through direct edit.
• C. Grant transfer users visibility to all locations in the tenant so the empty list is immediately resolved for the affected region.
• D. Create duplicate location records for the affected region so users can select them without changing the current organizational relationships.

A consultant is supporting a scheduled public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central import of manager assignment corrections before a month-end approval review. The import completes, but a subset of rows posts with warnings because the affected employees are currently part of in-flight workflow transactions for job changes. The warning rows remain unchanged after processing.
Other records in the same file update normally. The customer wants the monthly correction process to remain repeatable and does not want approved or pending workflow items cancelled just to make the administrative load succeed. The consultant must choose a fix that respects controlled change processing and avoids recurring manual cleanup for the operations team.
What is the best next step?
Response:

• A. Exclude employees with active workflow items from all future imports and require direct web-based maintenance for those cases.
• B. Cancel the in-flight workflow items for the affected employees, then rerun the import after the current file finishes.
• C. Retry the warning rows using a higher-access role so the import can override the pending workflow state for this cycle.
• D. Adjust the administrative import handling for records with active workflow-driven changes so the update process respects the current lifecycle state instead of competing with it.

In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant, a consultant is validating employee transfers between organizational units after a recent corporate data maintenance cycle. In the web-based UI, the transfer action opens normally, but for one set of regions the target department list is incomplete even though the departments exist in the system. Users can complete transfers in other regions without issue.
HR administrators confirm that the missing departments were introduced during the latest corporate structure update and should be available only within specific organizational combinations. The customer wants the consultant to restore accurate selection behavior without weakening organizational controls or exposing departments outside their intended scope.
What is the best next step?
Response:

• A. Ask HR administrators to complete transfers using a temporary generic department and correct the final department later by direct edit.
• B. Export the department records, create duplicate department entries for the affected regions, and use those duplicates in transfer processing.
• C. Grant all transfer users broader visibility to all departments so the missing entries appear immediately during the move process.
• D. Review the corporate data relationships and effective configuration for the new departments, then correct the organizational associations that govern their availability in transfers.

<strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Shared Maintenance Position Context Across Terminals</strong> A maintenance assignment can be saved, but manager-facing review later displays inconsistent terminal context. The operations director asks whether the team can proceed if HR data administration verifies maintenance assignments outside the system.
Which response best reflects the performance-versus-governance trade-off?
Response:

• A. Open all maintenance positions to terminal managers temporarily so they can confirm assignments faster during validation.
• B. Stop all dockside and maintenance testing until every position record across both port locations is rebuilt.
• C. Narrow the validation set and verify representative maintenance assignments in the system before relying on offline confirmation.
• D. Proceed with offline HR verification because it preserves the design schedule and the assignment record saves successfully.

In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management project, a consultant is testing a workflow for manager-submitted temporary work-arrangement changes. In the web-based environment, requests save and enter workflow for all tested populations, but for one newly added operating population the request routes to a general approval step instead of the intended review queue whenever both a temporary end date and a position-related organizational change are present.
Existing populations with the same combination still use the intended review queue. The customer wants to preserve the shared workflow framework because separate population-specific workflows would increase post-go-live maintenance. The consultant must correct the routing behavior without redesigning the broader process.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

• A. Ask managers in the new population to submit these requests through HR administrators until the routing design can be simplified.
• B. Add the intended review queue members to the general approval step so affected requests still receive oversight without further routing changes.
• C. Create a separate workflow for the new operating population so the intended review queue is always used for those requests.
• D. Review the routing condition or rule precedence for the new population, then correct the logic for requests combining temporary end date with position-related organizational change.