Download NCMA : CPCM Fragen & Antworten als PDF & Test Software

Nach der Bezahlung landet Ihr Lernpaket zur CPCM Prüfung innerhalb einer Minute in Ihrem Postfach – längeres Warten entfällt. Starten Sie 2026 noch am selben Tag mit den 183 Übungsfragen von ZertSoft in Ihre Vorbereitung auf die NCMA Certified Professional Contracts Manager.

NCMA CPCM Prüfungsübersicht:

NCMA CPCM Prüfungsthemen:

Wissenswertes rund um die NCMA Certified Professional Contracts Manager im Überblick

NCMA Certified Professional Contracts Manager CPCM Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen

Frage #1

Scenario 6.0: 1 - "When is a Commitment Not a Commitment?"
The buyer entered into a contract to lease 20,240 square feet of office space from Office Leasing Company (OLC). This space consisted of 8,545 square feet in Suite 1100 and 11,695 square feet in Suite 1106. The lease was for five years and provided the buyer with a renewal option as follows:
The buyer shall have the right to one renewal option for a five-year term. The renewal option shall become effective provided notice is given in writing to the lessor of the buyer's intent to exercise such option at least
270 days before the end of the original lease term; all other terms and conditions of this lease shall remain the same during any renewal term. Said notice shall be computed commencing with the day after the date of mailing.
The buyer also entered into Supplemental Lease Agreement Number 1 (SLA 1) , which stated it was being issued to reflect an expansion of 6,431 square feet in Suite 300. SLA 1 amended the original lease to encompass the additional space, changing the space from 20,240 square feet to approximately 26,671 square feet, and increased the annual rent to $1,098,790.70. SLA 1 also amended the renewal option text to reflect the new annual rent of $1,156,935.80.
The lease, as amended by SLA 1, also contained a buyer clause regarding authority to make changes to the lease. As stated in the clause, the buyer's authorized agent may, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this lease to the amount of space, provided the lessor consents to the change.
The first lease was set to end on December 31, 2021. On February 28, 2020, the buyer's contract specialist sent an email to OLC stating the buyer "hereby exercises its renewal option ... for a period of five years." The buyer's contract specialist noted that the email was "official notification that the buyer exercises its renewal option right as provided under this lease," and indicated that "this action will be followed up with a supplemental lease agreement in the near future." The email also stated that "per SLA 1, [the buyer] would not like to renew the expansion space portion of the lease." At that time, the buyer was planning to vacate a good portion of its leased inventory and requested that OLC allow the buyer to terminate the Suite 300 portion of the lease effective March 1, 2021.
On March 1, 2020, OLC agreed to accept the long renewal of Suites 1100 and 1106 per the renewal option if the buyer agreed to renew the third-floor space for two weeks, from January 1, 2021, to January 15, 2021. If OLC found a new tenant for a term extending beyond January 15, 2021, it would waive any further liability for the third-floor space as of the date of the replacement lease. After discussion, the buyer agreed over the phone to a two-week extension of Suite 300 at no rent.
On August 2, 2020, OLC emailed the buyer's contract specialist to ask when the SLA would be prepared. The buyer's contract specialist did not respond. Several weeks later, on August 24, the buyer determined that it no longer needed to rent any of the suites under the lease and requested to be released at lease termination. On September 10, OLC once again emailed the buyer's contract specialist to follow up on the preparation of the SLA. This time, the buyer's contract specialist responded, apologized for the delay, and stated that he would try to get the SLA to OLC in the next couple of weeks.
However, on October 26, the buyer's contract specialist informed OLC that the buyer no longer intended to pursue the renewal option, reflecting the buyer's August 24 determination that it no longer required any of the suites under the lease. The following day, on October 27, OLC responded that the buyer had already exercised the renewal option and that it intended to hold the buyer to that agreement.
On June 21, 2021, the buyer notified OLC that its renewal option would not be exercised and that the buyer would not be responsible for any rent payments after the lease expiration date of December 31, 2021.
Following a final decision from the buyer's authorized agent, which rejected the claims that the buyer had exercised the renewal option, OLC filed a claim.
In order to properly exercise an option:
o The option must be accepted;
o Such acceptance may not change, add to, or qualify the terms of the offer; and o The buyer's acceptance has to be unconditional and in exact accord with the terms of the contract being renewed.
Question:
How could OLC have removed ambiguity from the renewal process?

A. By requiring all changes, including the exercise of options, to be bilateral and approved by both the buyer and seller.
B. By holding a post-award debriefing to discuss the contract prior to finalization.
C. By including clear guidelines in the contract regarding how options are to be exercised.
D. By following a change management process that included documenting changes.

Frage #2

A benefit of performance-based acquisition is __________.

A. the seller has the ability to require specific solutions
B. a focus on process rather than results
C. shared incentives permitting innovation
D. detailed specifications leading to fewer protests

Frage #3

When a contractor submits a claim to the buyer, the buyer reviews the facts and prepares a written decision.
What must the contractor do while the buyer is considering the claim?

A. Document the work done after the claim was filed until the final decision is made
B. Segregate costs incurred after the claim was filed until the final decision is made
C. Stop work until the buyer issues the final decision
D. Continue performance pending a final resolution of the claim

Frage #4

Scenario 4.0:
The buyer intended to change the pricing structure for a contract for garbage collection services at one of its facilities. Previously, the contract included contract line items priced on a "per-ton" basis, along with overhead line items covering the contractor's variable costs. The buyer intended to issue a solicitation that eliminated the overhead line items, thus requiring all costs to be included in a "price-per-ton" pricing method.
Prior to issuing a solicitation, the buyer conducted market research to determine whether it was customary industry practice to price garbage collection services based on the weight of the garbage collected. This market research included three parts:
* Reviewing refuse contracts at three other locations;
* Posting a notice to potential sellers asking for feedback on the proposed structure, to which the buyer received seven responses-four of which suggested a monthly line-item structure, which would include variable costs and not be on a "per-ton" basis, since these four respondents indicated that a "per-ton" pricing structure was not a "customary commercial practice," and three had no comment about the line-item structure; and
* Obtaining "historical market research" that had been performed during the previous year by personnel at another buyer location, consisting of talking to a sales representative from a waste removal company who indicated that his company used a "per-ton" pricing structure that was a "practical method of pricing for trash removal services." Following this market research, the buyer determined that it was "in the buyer's best interest" to utilize the
"per-ton" approach and that it was a "customary commercial practice."
A solicitation was issued requiring offerors to submit fixed prices on a per-ton basis for several line items, for which the solicitation provided estimated quantities. The buyer removed the line items for overhead costs that had been present in the prior contract for waste removal. Instead, the new solicitation required offerors to submit prices that reflected "all fixed and variable costs" on a per-ton basis and only permitted the seller "to invoice on tonnage collected." The resulting statement of work indicated that the seller was required to provide all items necessary to perform the required services, including personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, materials, and supervision.
Question:
Was the buyer's market research sufficient to support its conclusion that a fixed "per-ton" pricing structure was a customary commercial practice?

A. Yes, because almost half of the respondents to the notice did not indicate that they opposed this pricing structure.
B. Yes, because it used three different methods of market research.
C. No, because a majority of the responses to the notice indicated that "per-ton" pricing was not a customary commercial practice.
D. No, because they did not use sufficiently broad methods of market research.

Frage #5

__________ apply(ies) to all potential and current contract managers. The blended and balanced implementation of these competencies will fortify the technical competencies of contract management.

A. Guiding Principles competencies
B. Pre-Award, Award, and Post-Award competencies
C. The Learn competency
D. Leadership and Management competencies

Fragen und Antworten: