Download SAP : C_DBADM_2601 Fragen & Antworten als PDF & Test Software

A regional event management company runs SAP HANA for ticket sales analytics. SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, but the operations team observes that statement-level troubleshooting evidence is missing for one reporting window. The general performance dashboard shows a brief response-time increase, while the detailed statement history has no entries for the affected period. A support coordinator proposes adjusting report schedules because the dashboard indicates a slowdown.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate the diagnostic evidence path before changing workload timing. The next reporting window must remain available while the team confirms why detailed statement evidence was not captured.
Which action best addresses the troubleshooting gap?

• A. Restart SAP HANA before the next window so the detailed statement history starts with a clean monitoring state.
• B. Verify the statement-history collection path for the affected period, correct the collection issue, and validate captured evidence in the next window.
• C. Ignore the issue because the database remained available and only detailed troubleshooting evidence was missing.
• D. Change the report schedule immediately because the response-time increase proves the workload timing is wrong.

CHALLENGE 1 - Hypercare Configuration Record Traceability
During hypercare review, customer service test users can open outage analytics reports from both SAP HANA systems. The installed stabilization database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded service reporting system has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a support handover note. What should the administrator do before accepting the hypercare comparison?

• A. Remove the documented value from the stabilization database record so both systems appear aligned.
• B. Reconcile the handover-note value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• C. Continue hypercare review and check the handover note only if users report inconsistent results.
• D. Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during hypercare.

A regional environmental testing company operates SAP HANA on-premises for laboratory turnaround analytics and is preparing a separate SAP HANA Cloud environment for migration rehearsal. During an administration review, the landscape worksheet shows one shared "administration owner" for both environments, but the operational evidence comes from different tools. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises system status, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud database status. The worksheet does not show which owner must act on each environment-specific alert or readiness item.
The constraint is that the administrator must make the landscape worksheet actionable without changing the assigned team structure. The handover must distinguish current operations from cloud migration readiness.
Which action best resolves the landscape ownership issue?

• A. Keep the shared owner entry because both systems are SAP HANA databases and the same team supports them.
• B. Treat the on-premises SAP HANA cockpit status as the controlling readiness signal for both environments.
• C. Split the worksheet by environment, evidence source, and operational responsibility while retaining the same administration team.
• D. Remove the SAP HANA Cloud readiness items until the migration rehearsal becomes the active operational workload.

A transportation company maintains an on-premises SAP HANA database for dispatch operations while newer planning data is being moved into SAP HANA Cloud. During a recovery readiness review, the administrator confirms that full backups are being created on schedule. However, a validation exercise shows that the expected recovery point for recent operational updates cannot be reached during simulation.
The backup catalog is present, and database availability remains normal. One team member proposes creating an additional full backup immediately to strengthen protection. The service manager instead wants the next action to close the recovery exposure for current operations, not only improve future coverage.
What is the best next action?

• A. Restart the backup-related services so that the recovery simulation recalculates against the latest available catalog entries.
• B. Verify whether the available backup chain supports the required recovery point and correct the missing continuity before changing the backup schedule.
• C. Delay further action because normal database availability proves the current protection model is operationally sufficient.
• D. Create a new full backup immediately because a fresh backup is the fastest way to improve recovery assurance.

A regional textile manufacturer is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The source export finishes, the cloud target is reachable, and a small validation query succeeds on the target. During the readiness review, the administrator notices that the migration evidence does not include confirmation that the target-side administration user can perform required monitoring and backup review tasks after import. The project sponsor wants approval because the transfer and query were successful.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational administration readiness in the cloud target, not only data movement. The rehearsal must remain repeatable for later migration waves.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

• A. Approve the migration wave because the export completed and the target query succeeded.
• B. Use the on-premises administration user for target checks so the team can reuse the same operational procedure after migration.
• C. Perform target-side administration validation with the intended cloud administration user and approve only after monitoring and backup review checks pass.
• D. Repeat the export with a larger dataset so the successful target query has stronger data coverage.