Download SAP : C_DBADM Fragen & Antworten als PDF & Test Software

Ob druckbares PDF, Desktop Test Engine oder Online Test Engine – bei ZertSoft wählen Sie für die C_DBADM Prüfung genau das Format, das zu Ihrem Lernalltag passt. Alle drei Varianten enthalten dieselben 216 Übungsfragen zur SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA und lassen sich flexibel kombinieren.

SAP C_DBADM Prüfungsübersicht:

SAP C_DBADM Prüfungsthemen:

Ihre Fragen zur SAP C_DBADM Zertifizierungsprüfung – beantwortet

SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA C_DBADM Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen

Frage #1

A regional consumer electronics repair company is rehearsing migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The migration tool completes the transfer, and database explorer confirms that representative queries return expected values on the cloud target. During validation, the administrator sees that the source system was monitored during export, but the cloud target was not included in the routine backup validation checklist after import. The project lead wants approval because data access was confirmed.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove the cloud target can be operated after import. The approval evidence must include resilience readiness for the migrated state, not only query validation.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

A. pprove the rehearsal because representative cloud queries returned expected values after the transfer.
B. dd the cloud target to the post-import backup validation checklist, run the validation for the migrated state, and approve only after evidence is recorded.
C. efer cloud backup validation until production cutover because the rehearsal already confirmed target query access.
D. epeat the full transfer because missing target backup validation proves the migrated data was not imported correctly.

Frage #2

A regional print services company is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The export completes, the target database is reachable, and database explorer confirms that sample queries return data. During review, the administrator finds that the rehearsal workbook does not include a comparison of administration checks between the source system before export and the cloud target after import. The project lead wants approval because the query results are correct.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational transition readiness, not only data access. The validation pattern must show that source administration evidence and target administration evidence were captured at the correct points in the migration sequence.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

A. efer administration comparison until production cutover so the rehearsal can focus only on transfer completion.
B. epeat the source export because missing administration comparison means the data movement failed.
C. pprove the rehearsal because successful target queries prove that the migrated data is usable.
D. apture source pre-export administration evidence and target post-import administration evidence, then approve only after both are validated.

Frage #3

A regional subscription meal company runs SAP HANA for delivery forecast analytics. SAP HANA cockpit shows normal database availability, but the operations team sees that a memory consumption graph has a gap during the nightly planning run. The alert log has no critical entry, yet planners reported slower dashboard response during that same interval. A support coordinator suggests lowering the memory alert threshold to catch the next occurrence.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore trustworthy monitoring evidence before changing alert sensitivity. The next planning run must allow the team to correlate workload behavior with memory evidence.
Which action best addresses the monitoring gap?

A. ower the memory alert threshold so the next planning run produces a clearer alert.
B. erify and correct the memory metric collection path, monitor the next planning run, and validate that the graph captures the interval.
C. gnore the graph gap because no critical alert was created and the database remained available.
D. estart the database before the next planning run so the memory graph begins with a clean measurement baseline.

Frage #4

<strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Close Aggregation Monitoring Evidence</strong> Claims reserve aggregation ran longer than expected during close rehearsal. Some monitoring thresholds were copied from the prior monthly profile before the upgrade. The reporting lead wants immediate tuning before the next rehearsal. What should the database owner do first?

A. ove aggregation tuning to SAP HANA Cloud because future reporting may transition there.
B. alidate current monitoring thresholds and preserve baseline evidence before approving tuning.
C. isable aggregation monitoring so the next rehearsal focuses only on report completion.
D. pply tuning immediately because the close aggregation runtime affects business timing.

Frage #5

<strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Release Control Timing for Urgent Replenishment Orders</strong> Timed execution runs show that urgent replenishment orders for short-shelf-life ingredients move fast enough in one plant only when approval handling is lighter than the common cutover model. The central support team wants early live operations to remain interpretable across all sites. What should the validation team do next?

A. eep the lighter local approval route because urgent food materials require the fastest possible progression
B. llow each plant to define its own urgent-order release behavior for the first operating week
C. ompare whether urgent-order timing remains acceptable under restored common approval handling before approving any local variation
D. emove urgent replenishment orders from cutover rehearsal and validate them after go-live stabilization

Fragen und Antworten: